CBT-I works in older adults, and some of the strongest evidence for it comes from trials run in older adults specifically. That matters, because sleeping pills are prescribed often in later life, and the comparison between the two has been tested directly in this age group.
The head-to-head trial
One of the most-cited CBT-I trials was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in older adults with chronic insomnia, comparing CBT with the sleeping pill zopiclone and with placebo. Sleep was measured objectively with polysomnography, not just reported.
At six weeks, sleep efficiency - the share of time in bed actually asleep - rose from 81.4% to 88.9% in the CBT group. In the zopiclone group it went from 82.3% to 81.5%. Total wake time fell by 52% with CBT, against 4% with the drug. At six months, the CBT group was at 90.1% and the medication group at 81.9%.
Total sleep time did not differ significantly between the groups. That is consistent with the wider evidence: CBT-I consolidates sleep rather than lengthening it. What CBT-I does and does not change.
Coming off sleeping pills
A second trial, also in older adults with chronic insomnia, looked at people taking benzodiazepines who wanted to stop. A supervised taper combined with CBT left 85% medication-free, against 48% with the taper alone and 54% with CBT alone.
That was a planned, supervised reduction - not stopping on your own. What the research says about coming off sleeping pills, and why that conversation starts with your prescriber.
What the guidelines say
The American College of Physicians recommends CBT-I as the initial treatment for all adults with chronic insomnia - there is no upper age limit on that. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's medication guideline makes fourteen drug recommendations, and all fourteen are weak, on low or very low quality evidence. Its behavioral guideline strongly recommends multicomponent CBT-I.
Newer, more preliminary evidence
A 2026 secondary analysis of a trial in adults aged 60 and over found that those who received CBT-I showed a slower pace of biological aging on one epigenetic measure than those who received sleep education. It was a small, preliminary analysis, two of the three measures used showed no difference, and the authors call for replication. What it found, and why it should be read carefully.



